logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2015.08.20 2015가단1642
물품대금
Text

1. The Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff KRW 33,720,830 as well as 20% per annum from January 17, 2015 to the day of complete payment.

Reasons

1. Around March 30, 2013, the Plaintiff: (a) supplied the Defendant with construction materials, such as Manle, etc. equivalent to KRW 5,942,200, at the site of construction works related to the Defendant’s 2 industrial complex, and around May 31, 2013; (b) supplied the Defendant’s construction materials, including Manle, etc. equivalent to KRW 7,772,600, at the site of construction works related to Hannon Cosmetics; and (c) during the period from April 5, 2013 to April 30, 2013, the fact that the Plaintiff supplied the Defendant’s construction materials, such as Manle, etc. equivalent to KRW 20,006,030, at the site of the Defendant’s 20,030,030, does not conflict between the parties; or (d) the purport of the entire testimony can be acknowledged by comprehensively taking into account the following points: evidence A (including serial numbers).

Therefore, the Defendant is obligated to pay to the Plaintiff the total sum of KRW 3,720,830 (=5,942,000 won KRW 7,772,606,030) and damages for delay at the rate of 20% per annum under the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings from January 17, 2015 to the date of full payment, which is the day following the delivery date of each of the above materials.

2. As to the defendant's assertion and judgment, the defendant asserted that the construction of this case was supplied with the materials of KRW 20,006,030, which the plaintiff asserted as to the construction of this case (the above No. 3), and the defendant did not receive a contract for the construction of this case from the ordering person, etc., and that there was no contract for the supply of the materials between the plaintiff and the plaintiff, and that A, who was not granted the right of representation from the defendant, provided the above materials under the name of

On April 30, 2013, the Plaintiff, who was supplied with the Defendant on April 30, 201, issued an electronic tax invoice on the price of the materials.

arrow