logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2015.05.21 2015고단1182
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a Crane XG car.

At around 06:50 on January 15, 2014, the Defendant was driving straightly in the direction of the F pharmacy distance from the direction of the road in front of Empt D in Busan Metropolitan City.

In such cases, a person engaged in driving of a vehicle has a duty of care to care in advance by safely driving the vehicle in the front line and by safely driving the vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and proceeded with the opposite side of the above road, which led to a conflict of the victim's G drivers' right-hand side of the car driving in the front side of the passenger car of the Defendant, which was operated by a part of the center line in the direction of the pungdong in the direction of the FJ distance of the FJ.

As a result, the Defendant inflicted injury on the fluorum salt, etc. requiring approximately two weeks of treatment period on the victim G, and suffered injury on the fluorum salt, etc. requiring approximately four weeks of treatment period on the part of the victim H, who is the chief passenger of the fluor, and at the same time, escaped without taking measures such as relief of the victim, etc. even though the said fluoralG car was damaged by the 4,966,322 won.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning G;

1. A report on the occurrence of a traffic accident and a report on actual condition investigation;

1. Application of written estimates and written diagnosis to statutes;

1. Article 5-3 (1) 2 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 148 and 54 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the crime (the point of failing to take measures after destroying and damaging property);

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act is that the defendant does not take the measure of traffic accident even though he/she did not take the measure, and runs away.

arrow