A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On March 27, 2015, at around 01:25, the Defendant was arrested as a flagrant offender by police officer F, etc. belonging to the House E District of the Busan High Police Station, due to the act, such as taking a trial expense to a taxi engineer in relation to the service fee in relation to the service fee during the use of the taxi, refusing to pay the use fee in full, and interfering with business.

Since then, the Defendant was aboard the patrol vehicle and was traveling along to the E zone located in the Nowon-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, and was forced to temporarily stop the patrol vehicle due to the difficulty in normal operation of the patrol vehicle. Among them, under the arbitration of the above police officer, the Defendant and the subsequent taxi officer discussed about the issue of payment of charges with the Defendant and the subsequent taxi officer, and the Defendant expressed the above police officer’s desire to “finite finite feat, finite feat” to “finite finite feat, finite feat,” and sold the face part of the police officer once.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers on the maintenance of public order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of F;

1. CD의 영상 피고인 및 변호인은, 피고인이 순찰차 내에서 발버둥을 치자 경찰관들이 갑자기 차량을 세우더니 어두운 곳에서 자신을 차량에서 끌어내려 수갑을 풀어주더니 폭행을 가하여 본인이 땅에 뒹굴게 된 사실이 있을 뿐 피고인이 경찰관을 폭행한 사실은 없다고 주장하므로 살피건대, 이 법원이 적법하게 채택하여 조사한 증거에 의하여 인정되는 다음과 같은 사정, 즉 현장에 출동하였던 경찰관 F은 이 법정에 출석하여 ① 경찰관들이 처음 출동했을 당시 피고인은 택시기사와 요금 문제로 시비 중이었는데 피고인이 경찰관들의 중재에도 불구하고 택시비를 내지 못하겠다고 하자 경찰관들은 피고인을 사기죄의 현행범인으로 체포하여 경찰차에 태운 점, ② 경찰관들은 피고인을 처음 경찰차에 태울 당시 수갑을 채우지...