The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., imprisonment with prison labor) by the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the defendant is favorable to the fact that the defendant recognized the crime of this case and the driving distance (70m) is not driving.

On the other hand, despite the fact that the Defendant had a criminal record of drunk driving, and was sentenced to a suspended sentence of 6 months on account of the crime committed while driving without a license in 2016, the Defendant again committed the instant non-license and drinking without a license in spite of the fact that she had been sentenced to a suspended sentence of 2016, and was sentenced to a suspended sentence of 6 months, and the crime was committed again. When the instant crime was discovered, it is not good that the quality of the instant crime was committed by concealing another person’s criminal act and attempted to conceal the

There is no special relationship or change of circumstances that can be newly considered by this court, and in full view of the defendant's age, character and conduct, family relationship, circumstances after the crime, and various sentencing conditions as shown in the records and arguments of this case, the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable.

Defendant’s assertion is not accepted.

3. The defendant's appeal is without merit and thus dismissed pursuant to Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.