1. Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000;

2. Where the defendant does not pay the above fine; 50.

Punishment of the crime

On September 3, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of three years for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a collective, deadly weapons, etc.) at the Seoul Central District Court on September 3, 201, and the judgment became final and conclusive on September 12, 2014.

1. On May 15, 2010, the Defendant: (a) at the entertainment room run by the Defendant near subway Station located in Gwanak-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, the Defendant said that “The Defendant is operating the subway station; (b) is going to promote the global project; (c) is going to promote the global project; (d) is being registered as an investor No. 8 and then will put each investor into a subordinate investor. On that hand, the Defendant would continue to deposit money with the passbook even if the investment was made.”

However, even if the defendant receives the investment from the victim, he did not have any intention or ability to create profits by inviting other investors or securing investment sources.

Accordingly, the Defendant, as above, by deceiving the victim as above, received 3 million won through the bank account (E) opened in the name of the Defendant on May 20, 2010 from the victim, and acquired 2 million won through the above account on June 3, 2010.

2. On October 9, 2012, the Defendant borrowed money: (a) at an influent office located in Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, the Defendant: (b) stated that “I would lend one million won of automobile repair expenses to the victim D; and (c) I would pay the first invested money after one week; and (d) I would be able to pay the said investment expenses. There is a restaurant G in the F; (b) I would be a restaurant in the Republic of Korea, and (c) I would be able to receive money from the owner to change into the original restaurant and operate the original restaurant without one week thereafter

However, the Defendant did not have received the above restaurant operation right, and even if he borrowed money from the victim, there was no intention or ability to pay the money.

Accordingly, the defendant deceivings the victim as above and belongs to it from the victim.