Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

Of the facts charged in the instant case, the fraud of Defendant A around March 11, 2013.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A Although there is no intention or ability to allow the victim E to be selected as the waste cable disposal service provider from the KT, around April 26, 2013, the victim would be selected as the waste cable disposal service provider of the KT if the victim would be 20,000 won from the Sejong-ro, Jung-gu, Seoul with the street funds.

Along with the false statement, it received KRW 20,000 from the above victim as a rain fund and acquired it by fraud.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspect to the prosecution of a part of the defendant (including the E or F statement);

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the suspect of a part of the police against the defendant or F;

1. Statement made by a part of the prosecution against E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes regarding transaction details;

1. The portion not guilty of the relevant Article of the Criminal Act, Article 347(1) of the Criminal Act, the portion of not guilty of imprisonment with prison labor

1. Summary of the facts charged

A. On March 2013, Defendant A(1) received request from the victim E to obtain a loan from the Fund necessary for real estate implementation in the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Nam-gu G and sent the intent of Defendant B through the above Defendant B (State) to promote a fund procurement arrangement in and out of KRW 20 billion if the e-mail meets the premise. Defendant B sent the e-mail “Written intention to arrange for the fund procurement related to the e-mail construction project in Incheon G G G, which the said e-mail issued by the said victim.”

In the office of H in Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government around March 11, 2013, the fact that the said victim’s statement that it is necessary to present it to the partner was defective that the original was required. Although the said B or (State) did not demand money from the person in charge of the trad securities and the said victim did not need money in order to receive the original letter, the said victim’s receipt of the above original letter of intent must have personnel management. Thus, the said victim’s receipt of the said letter of intent is false and that the said amount is necessary to receive KRW 15 million from the said victim, and the said victim received KRW 15 million from the said victim and additionally paid money two weeks later.