The judgment of the court below is reversed.

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

The above fine shall not be paid by the defendant.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., a fine of KRW 7 million) imposed by the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. Whether the Defendant’s blood alcohol concentration is considerably high at the time of driving under the influence of alcohol in this case is disadvantageous to the Defendant.

On the other hand, the defendant is an initial criminal who has no record of criminal punishment.

The distance driven at the time of the crime of this case was short and did not occur.

Recognizing the crime of this case, the attitude of reflecting it seems to be contradictory.

Examining the aforementioned conditions of sentencing in the records and arguments of this case, such as equity with the sentencing of similar cases similar to the defendant's circumstances, and the age, character and conduct, environment, health conditions, the circumstances of the crime, the circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentence of the court below is deemed unfair because it is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion of unfair sentencing is justified.

3. Since the appeal by the defendant is well-grounded, the judgment below is reversed pursuant to Article 364(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and the appeal by the defendant is again ruled as follows.

[Discied reasoning of the judgment below] Criminal facts and summary of evidence recognized by the court is identical to the facts constituting the crime and summary of evidence, and thus, the summary of evidence is identical to each corresponding column of the judgment below. Thus, it is acceptable in accordance with Article 369 of the

Application of Statutes

1. Relevant Article of the Act and Articles 148-2 (3) 2 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the selection of fines for criminal facts, and the selection of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

1. Scope of applicable sentences under law: Fines of five million won to ten million won;

2. Prior to the decision of sentencing, the sentence shall be determined as per Disposition in consideration of the various circumstances stated in the part on the Defendant’s argument of unfair sentencing.