1. The plaintiff (defendant)'s appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff (Defendant).

purport, purport, ..

1. The reasoning of the court of the first instance’s explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the first instance judgment, except for partial revision as follows. Thus, this case is quoted as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

ARTICLE 1-e

The phrase “3,686 square meters” of one week shall be deemed as “3,685 square meters”, and every 1st g of paragraph (g) shall be as follows.

any subsection of this subsection.

H. On October 29, 2014, the Plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the Defendant seeking a judgment identical with the purport of the instant claim with the Seoul Central District Court 2014Gahap5777, and was sentenced to a favorable judgment (the subject judgment of review) by the said court on June 19, 2015.

ARTICLE 2-2

Pursuant to Paragraph 1, “each entry of Note 5 through 9” shall be deemed to read “each entry of Note 2, 5, and 9”, and 2.

B. 5. 1. The appellate court of the first instance referred to in paragraph 5. 1 to “the appellate court of the judgment on review”, and 3.

A. 1. Paragraph 6-8 of Paragraph 1: “The resolution of the board of directors and the permission of the Mayor/Do governor for the sale and purchase contract for the G land and I land were re-written, and the ownership of the said land was transferred to the Defendant,” each of which read “the resolution of the board of directors and the permission of the Mayor/Do governor, transferred the ownership of the G land and I land.”

(b)(1)(b)(9) of paragraph (2)(b)(3) of Article 3(1)(b) of the Act shall be construed as “doing”, and shall be construed as “doing.”

B. (1) Article 45(2) of the Civil Act’s Article 45(1) of the Civil Act’s Article 45(1)2 of the 2nd paragraph (3) of the 3nd paragraph.

B. (1) The Plaintiff added the following to the end of paragraph (3) of Article 3(3) to the effect that the sales contract for G land and I’s land, which is part of the subject real estate of the instant sales contract, was a contract made as part of the implementation of the instant sales contract null and void, and thus, the instant sales contract also becomes null and void as in the instant sales contract. However, the instant sales contract is divided in sequence into the Defendant, on the ground that only 165,000 square meters of land C’s 598,682 square meters of land, (50 square meters)