logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.06.30 2015가합555526
채권조사확정재판에 대한 이의의 소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. Seoul Central District Court No. 2014 dated June 23, 2015 No. 201.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On August 3, 2012, the Defendant concluded a performance guarantee insurance contract as of August 3, 2012, etc.) the Defendant is a debtor A Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “debtor”) on August 3, 2012.

) and “C apartment reinforced concrete construction (section 2)” (hereinafter “C apartment construction”)

(1) In relation to the construction of the insured, Shee Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Shee Construction”).

(2) The insured amount is KRW 796,00,000, and the insured period is from May 30, 2012 to August 31, 2013 (hereinafter “performance guarantee insurance contract as of August 3, 2012”).

(1) The date of issuance of the Bank of Korea issued on August 3, 2012, the date of issuance of the certificate of long-term time deposit (all principal and interest) No. 100,000,000 (all principal and interest) for each type of certificate of security (the current status of securities held on August 31, 2024 during the trust period).

2.The foregoing collateral will be furnished as a collateral (including principal and interest accrued on the principal) in connection with any insurance contract (or scheduled to be entered into) between the policyholder and the obligor company, and any additional guarantee insurance contract involving it, as follows:

(2) An insurance contract related to the provision of collateral was terminated without an insured incident.

(7) In the event that a term deposit issued by a depository bank with business partnership is offered as a security by means of a security, the details of the said term deposit product has been sufficiently notified, and the debtor company entered into a performance guarantee insurance contract with the defendant on August 3, 2012, and confirmed that it was offered as a security to the defendant on the same day when the debtor company entered into the performance guarantee contract with the defendant on the same day with the defendant as of August 3, 2012 (hereinafter referred to as "right of pledge as of August 3, 2012"), the debtor company would be entitled to KRW 100,000,000 for the long term term deposit bond to the Industrial Bank of Korea of the debtor company (hereinafter referred to as "right of pledge as of August 3, 2012").

B. The defendant was ordered to set up this.

arrow