logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2013.09.13 2013고합292
준강간
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case reveals that the Defendant was aware of the Victim D (V, 22 years old) who was an employee while working as a manager in the Daejeon Daejeon-gu, Daejeon-gu for about five years, and maintained a friendly relationship.

On June 12, 2013, at around 20:30, the Defendant visited the victim’s house, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Incheon, E loan 301, and visited the victim’s house, from around 02:00 of the same month, and continued to close a large quantity of beer and beer with the victim’s stude F, which is the stude of the victim’s stude.

Therefore, at a certain point between the victim and the above F from 02:00 to 05:00 of the same month, on the 13th day of the same month, on which the victim and the above F were kneeed, the defendant raised the victim's name, whose consciousness is unknown, toward her chest, and up to her panty part, and sexual intercourse once.

Accordingly, the defendant has sexual intercourse with the victim by taking advantage of the victim's mental condition.

2. We examine the judgment. The facts charged in the instant case are crimes falling under Articles 299 and 297 of the Criminal Act, and may be prosecuted only upon a complaint of the victim under Article 2 of the Addenda of the Criminal Act (amended by Act No. 11574, Dec. 18, 2012) and Article 306 of the former Criminal Act (amended by Act No. 11574, Dec. 18, 2012).

However, according to the agreement and written application for no punishment and written withdrawal of a complaint submitted on August 23, 2013 in this court, the complainant expressed his/her intention not to be punished against the defendant under the agreement with the defendant on August 23, 2013 after the institution of the instant case. The victim's complaint against the defendant was lawfully revoked.

Therefore, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 5 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow