1. The Plaintiff within the scope of the property inherited from the net G:

A. Defendant B shall be KRW 61,66,667 and this shall apply.

1. On April 4, 2005, the Plaintiff received an order to pay to the Plaintiff KRW 185,000,000 as to the Plaintiff and the amount calculated at the rate of 5% per annum from March 4, 2000 to April 8, 2005, and 20% per annum from the next day to the date of full payment, with the overall purport of the pleadings as to the evidence No. 1 of the judgment as to the cause of the claim No. 1 of the claim, and the Plaintiff’s heir died on April 10, 2009, and his heir died on April 3/9, 2009, and his heir is recognized.

위 인정 사실에 의하면, 특별한 사정이 없는 한 원고에게 ① 피고 B은 61,666,667원(≒ 185,000,000원 × 3/9)과 이에 대하여 2000. 3. 4.부터 2005. 4. 8.까지는 연 5%, 그 다음날부터 다 갚는 날까지는 연 20%의 각 비율로 계산한 돈을, ② 피고 D, E, F은 각 41,111,111원(≒ 185,000,000원 × 2/9)과 이에 대하여 2000. 3. 4.부터 2005. 4. 8.까지는 연 5%, 그 다음날부터 다 갚는 날까지는 연 20%의 각 비율로 계산한 돈을 각 지급할 의무가 있다.

2. The Defendants asserted that the Defendants’ assertion on the Defendants did not comply with the Plaintiff’s claim since they were qualified as to the inheritance of the network G’s property.

In light of the overall purport of the arguments in the evidence Nos. 1 and 2, the Defendants are obliged to pay the money set forth in paragraph (1) within the scope of inheritance from the network G, since the Defendants are recognized to have received a qualified acceptance trial on the inheritance of the network G’s property in the Jeonju District Court Decision 2009Ra-94 case.

Therefore, the defendants' assertion is justified within the above recognition scope, and the heir's liability is limited according to the qualified acceptance, and it does not change the existence or scope of the inheritance obligation, and therefore the defendants' assertion in excess of the above recognition scope cannot be accepted.

3. If so, the Plaintiff’s instant case.