1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff was first appointed as a public official on July 14, 2003, and served as B of the Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention from November 2, 2010 to August 15, 201 as the Ministry of Health and Welfare, and is working as C of the Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention from August 16, 201 to the Ministry of Health and Welfare.

B. Around May 201, the Prime Minister’s Office Official Service Review Board notified the Defendant of the irregularities regarding the Plaintiff, with the following content:

Demeaning dignity, such as using superior position, sexual harassment, etc. of female female workers - Inappropriate physical contact for female workers and sexual studios, which are inappropriate for them - telephone and sexual studios - lack of capabilities as public officials, such as creating an atmosphere of fear, such as abusiveism, etc. subject to the contract workers transmitting text messages, and creating movements to file group complaints due to the promotion of their own duties, etc.

C. The Audit and Inspection Office affiliated with the Defendant was to conduct a self-audit on June 28, 201 to July 1, 201, and the audit and inspection office attached to the Defendant on August 25, 2011 as the result of the audit and inspection.

1. Of the grounds for disciplinary actions, the Plaintiff demanded “request for a disciplinary decision” against the Plaintiff on the grounds of irregularities such as the statement in the column for requesting a disciplinary decision.

On September 26, 2011, the Director of the Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention requested the Defendant to review the audit results, but the application for review was dismissed on November 16, 201.

E. The Defendant’s attached Form to the Central Disciplinary Committee on November 28, 2011

1. The Plaintiff demanded a resolution of disciplinary action on the grounds of the disciplinary reasons such as the column for requesting a resolution of disciplinary action among the disciplinary reasons.

F. The Central Disciplinary Committee is attached on February 10, 2012

1. A decision was made on one month salary reduction for the Plaintiff to recognize the grounds for disciplinary action as stated in the column for the resolution of disciplinary action among the grounds for disciplinary action (hereinafter the recognized grounds for disciplinary action referred to as “instant grounds for disciplinary action,” and setting forth the sequences).

G. On February 23, 2012, the Defendant took a disciplinary measure against the Plaintiff for one month of salary reduction (hereinafter “instant disciplinary measure”).