The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. It is reasonable to take into account the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant’s judgment on the grounds of appeal of the instant case is against each other while making a confession of each of the instant crimes; (b) there is no record of criminal punishment except for those sentenced to a fine on one occasion due to the crime of embezzlement of stolen objects; (c) some of the larceny damage was temporarily returned to the victims at an investigative agency; (d) six of the 16 victims of the instant crime were agreed at the lower court; (e) more than seven of the victims deposited KRW 1310,00,000 for seven of the victims; and (e) the fact that the health status is not good because the victim suffers from the functional s

However, each of the crimes of this case committed by the defendant jointly or in collusion with Co-Defendant B of the court below. The number of crimes revealed that the defendant had repeatedly committed a crime for about five months in a short period of 23 months is not good, the total amount of damage is about 5,740,000 won, the defendant planned and executed each of the crimes of this case led by the defendant. At the beginning of the crime, the defendant prevented the victim from committing the crime by breaking the difference in the victim's house house and intrudes the victim's house before emergency arrest on August 1, 2012, even though the victim had been living in the house, the law on the crime of larceny has been developed, such as where the victim had been aware that he had been living in the house of the above victim, and caused the victim to have infringed on the house of the above victim's house and caused the theft, and there is no special motive for the defendant to suspend indictment as a crime of special larceny, such as reflects with the head of Suwon District Prosecutors' Office in around 2011.