1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months;

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person engaging in driving Cunst Motor Vehicle.

On May 28, 2015, the Defendant driven the above car at around 22:20, and proceeded at the speed of 50km in the direction of Daejeon from the direction of the entrance of the side office of the sub-section located in the sub-section of the Sejong Metropolitan City.

At the same time, in such a case, the driver has a duty of care to prevent the accident in advance by driving safely by keeping the front left and right well.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and proceeded without examining the front door properly, while driving D, which was parked on the road upstream of the same direction, in the same direction.

D’s father’s fright learning car owned by the victim E was shocked by the front part of the Defendant’s vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant, after the above occupational negligence, destroyed the above car owned by the victim to the extent that KRW 5,222,516 of the cost of repairing the damaged vehicle, such as the exchange of a spread, etc., and escaped without making a stop and taking necessary measures.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's statement at the sixth public trial date in court;

1. Each legal statement of witness D, G and H;

1. A traffic accident report (1) (1) and a report on the occurrence of a traffic accident;

1. Application of the written estimate statutes;

1. Relevant Articles 148 and 54 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting a crime and Articles 148 and 54 of the same Act concerning the selective punishment;

1. Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution (Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act provides that the liability of the crime of this case is not minor in light of the circumstances leading to the crime of this case, the criminal records of the defendant are identical to the defendant, and the defendant was unable to agree with the victim, under the circumstances unfavorable to the defendant, the defendant is starting and opposing the crime of this case, and the amount of damage resulting from the crime of this case has been repaid through automobile insurance is favorable to the defendant.