logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2019.07.18 2019구단10040
난민불인정처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of disposition;

A. On September 13, 2017, the Plaintiff, a foreigner of the nationality of the Russia Federation (hereinafter referred to as “ Russia”), entered the Republic of Korea as a sojourn status for visa exemption (B-1 and 60 days of sojourn) and applied for refugee status to the Defendant on November 17, 2017.

B. On February 9, 2018, the Defendant rendered a decision to recognize refugee status (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on the ground that the Plaintiff does not constitute a case where there is a well-founded fear that is a requirement for refugee status as prescribed by Article 1 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees and Article 1 of the Protocol on the Status of Refugees.

C. On February 23, 2018, the Plaintiff filed an objection with the Minister of Justice on February 23, 2018, but was dismissed on September 14, 2018.

【Ground of recognition】 The fact that there has been no dispute, Gap Nos. 1, 2, Eul Nos. 1 and 2 (including paper numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The plaintiff's mother was unable to seek a job on the ground that the plaintiff's mother was Muslim at the time when the plaintiff's mother resided in Russia, was discriminated against his children, was searched by the police without any justifiable reason, and the plaintiff's father was subjected to unfair treatment by the police since the opening of the plaintiff's body into Muslim, and was subject to questioning from the police about the opening of the plaintiff's body, and the plaintiff's family members moved to Egypt but even Egypt was discriminated against the plaintiff's family members on the ground that the plaintiff's family members are foreigners. However, the disposition of this case which did not recognize it on the other premise is unlawful.

(b) Entry in the attached Form of relevant Acts and subordinate statutes;

C. In light of the following circumstances acknowledged by comprehensively taking account of the respective descriptions of subparagraphs 2 and 3 as well as the purport of the entire pleadings, all the evidence and arguments submitted by the Plaintiff may be considered.

arrow