Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

No person shall interfere with the rescue, transfer, first aid, or medical treatment of an emergency patient by emergency medical personnel by means of violence, intimidation, deceptive scheme, force, or other means, or destroy, damage, or occupy medical facilities, equipment, medicines, or other objects for emergency medical services provided by a medical institution, etc.

Nevertheless, at around 03:50 on September 7, 2019, the Defendant was released from the emergency room of the hospital located in the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company.

Then, the Defendant collected and destroyed two monitoring units on duty, which were set up on the Defendant’s side, by falling up on the floor of the watch table, and destroyed them by putting up two monitors on duty, and the string unit of E (33 years old) which is a doctor on duty.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with emergency medical treatment of emergency medical personnel and destroyed medical facilities due to such violence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each written statement of D and E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report internal investigation (based on field photographs, etc.), internal investigation reports (based on CCTV photographs and video CDs attached), investigation reports (Submission of certificates of qualifications for victims), investigation reports (based on phone calls for specific crimes), and criminal investigation reports (based on phone calls);

1. Articles 60 (2) 1 and 12 of the Emergency Medical Service Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act with regard to the order of provisional payment is that the crime of this case is not good.

However, the defendant led to a confession of the crime of this case and divided the errors, and the victim D and E did not wish to punish the victims, and the damaged facilities also have been compensated.