1. The Plaintiff:

A. Defendant B is each point of the attached Form 1, 2, 5, 6, and 1, among the real estate listed in the attached Table 1 list.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is an organization consisting of owners of land, etc. conducting an urban environment improvement project by setting the Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government E Group 43281m2 as a project implementation district.

Defendant B, among the real estate listed in the attached Table 1 list in the said project area, connects each point of (A) section of 1,2,5,6, and 1 among the real estate listed in the attached Table 1 list in the said project area, and of (c) section of 14.60 square meters in the attached Table 7, 8, 9, 10, and 7, among the real estate listed in the attached Table 1 list in the attached Table 1 list, each point of (a) section of 54.04 square meters in succession, and Defendant C, among the real estate listed in the attached Table 1 list in the said project area, connects each point of (b) section of 2, 3, 4, 5, and 2, among the real estate listed in the attached Table 1 list in the said project area, to each point of (c) section of 11, 1213, 14, 15, and 15, and each part (c) of the real estate leased and leased each of the attached Table 1 list in the project area.

B. On September 11, 2014, the head of Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government approved the implementation of the project on the Plaintiff, and approved the management and disposal plan on November 26, 2015 and announced it on the same day.

C. On the other hand, on July 28, 2017, the Seoul Special Metropolitan City Regional Land Tribunal made a ruling of expropriation of the instant real estate 1, 2, and 3 real estate, etc. (hereinafter “instant adjudication of expropriation”) on September 15, 2017 for the Plaintiff’s improvement project, and accordingly, on September 14, 2017, the Plaintiff deposited each business compensation amount under the said adjudication with the Defendants as deposits.

[Ground of Recognition] Defendant B and C: A without dispute, each entry in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 10 (including paper numbers), the purport of the whole pleadings, and the purport of the whole pleadings: deemed confession

2. As to the Plaintiff’s claim against Defendant B and C for the delivery of the instant 1 and 2 real estate, each of the aforementioned Defendants’ respective possession and use.