logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2014.10.31 2014고단1308
성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(공중밀집장소에서의추행)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

피고인은 2014. 5. 20. 08:18경부터 08:25경까지 안양시 만안구 만안동에 있는 석수역에서부터 서울 금천구 가산동에 있는 가산디지털단지역까지 운행 중인 지하철 1호선 제614호 10번째 객차 안에서, 출근 시간대로 혼잡하여 피해자 C(여, 28세)가 피하기 어려운 상황에서 피해자의 뒤에 바짝 붙어 선 후 자신의 성기를 피해자의 오른쪽 엉덩이에 대고 수회 비볐다.

As such, the Defendant committed an indecent act against the victim in the passenger car, which is a means of public transportation.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of police statement protocol to C

1. Relevant Article on criminal facts, Article 11 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes and Selection of Fines (including the fact that there is no criminal record) concerning the punishment of sexual crimes;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

1. The amount of a fine shall be determined in consideration of the circumstances, such as: (a) the degree of indecent conduct on the grounds of sentencing under Article 16(2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes Committed to Order; (b) the occurrence of a victim’s sense of shame and suffering seems to be very serious (12 pages of investigation records); and (c) the fact that the Defendant who has registered personal information was unable to obtain a letter from the victim. Where the conviction of the Defendant becomes final and conclusive, the Defendant is a person subject to registration of personal information under Article 42(1) of the Act on

However, in light of the fact that there is no criminal history of the same kind of crime and the fact that the registration of personal information alone seems to have an effect to prevent recidivism to a certain extent, etc., it is judged that there is a special circumstance that the disclosure of personal information should not be disclosed, and thus, it is not ordered to issue an order to disclose the registered information.

arrow