logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2013.06.12 2013고정52
교통사고처리특례법위반등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,500,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around October 29, 2012, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed Driving) driving a vehicle of approximately 45 km without the driver’s license, from the front of the luminous Myeon Office of the luminous Dopology at the time of the Gyeonggi-gu in Seoul, Gangnam-gu to the front of the Yan-gu in Yangju-si, the flow of which was about 45 km from the front of the Dopology office to the next 06:25 day of the next day.

2. On October 30, 2012, the Defendant violated the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (hereinafter “Special Cases”) by driving a B-A-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-

In such cases, when a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle is likely to impede normal traffic of other motor vehicles running in the direction of change, he/she shall not change his/her course, and he/she has the duty of care to give advance notice of change of course and to prevent accidents by safely changing the lane through the operation of direction direction, etc. in advance, and the situation of traffic is well considered.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and changes the lanes.

The front part of the D D Dump truck drivened by the victim C(the age of 44) who was driven at a speed of about 70 kilometers per hour according to one lane in the same direction was turned into the left part of the target vehicle, and the latter part of E-driving bus driven at a speed of two times the right part of the target vehicle continuously followed by two lanes in the same direction as the part on the right part of the target vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant did not put the victim C at a disadvantage in exercising the Defendant’s right of defense against the above victim’s occupational negligence, and thus, the Defendant clearly identified the victim C to the victim, and suffered injury to the victim G (26 years of age) who was accompanied by the Defendant’s driver’s vehicle for approximately two weeks in need of medical treatment.

(i) the evidence;

arrow