A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On March 22, 2017, the Defendant obstructed the performance of official duties, at around 13:15, 2017, who was urged by the drunk on the front side of Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City Gwangjin-gu, to return home from the D District Rabse E, etc., the Seoul Mine Police Station D District Gyeongjin-gu, Seoul, to the police officer, who was called out, and was urged by the police officer E, who was able to have frightd to have fright at a time when she frightd and frighted to have fright, and committed assault by the police officer E.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of reported cases by police officers.

2. The Defendant made a public insult of the victim E, who solicits the Defendant to return home at the above date, time, and place, to the victim E, with the large interest of “I must see, I must see, I must see, and to see, I do not see,” and made a public insult of the victim E.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of police statement protocol to E;

1. Relevant legal provisions of the Criminal Act, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of public duties), Article 311 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor, respectively;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Suspension of execution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (including the fact that the defendant misleads and reflects the defendant, the form and degree of the crime, the circumstances leading to the crime, etc.);