logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2015.11.25 2015가단500816
손해배상(산)
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 12,595,770 for the Plaintiff and 5% per annum from August 8, 2013 to November 25, 2015.

Reasons

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. The facts of recognition are as follows: (a) the Plaintiff was employed by the Defendant on August 8, 2013, and around 11:20, as the Plaintiff used 4 persons who used 4 persons who used 7 persons who used 7 persons who used the Plaintiff’s work, but the Defendant was unable to use 8 persons who used 7 persons who used 7 persons who used 7 persons who used 8 persons who used 8 persons who used 8 persons who used 8 persons who used 8 others; (b) while the 8 persons who used 8 persons who were in charge of 8 persons who were in charge of 8 persons who used 8 others, the fact that the 8 persons who were in charge of 8 persons who were in charge of the Plaintiff’s work became in contact with stoppy and the 8 persons who used 8 persons who used 8 others, and the 100 persons who were in charge of the 8 persons’ work around the left snow and the left snow (hereinafter “instant accident”); and (c) the Plaintiff did not have any dispute between the parties, as witness evidence No. 2.

B. The Defendant, as the Plaintiff’s employer, bears the duty of safety consideration for the Plaintiff, who is an employee, and according to the above facts of recognition, the Plaintiff is using the Defendant’s dog while working.

The plaintiff suffered injury, and the defendant provided the plaintiff with protective outfits when the plaintiff was engaged in dangerous work.

Since there is a lack of evidence to prove that the safety education was conducted in order to avoid using the eight galaser who should not use the work or to safely work, the defendant is liable for damages suffered by the plaintiff due to the violation of the duty of safety consideration as the plaintiff's employer.

However, according to the witness E's testimony, the plaintiff's his own judgment at the time of the accident in this case removed the safety coverr by changing the 8's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's '

arrow