A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

(e).

Punishment of the crime

On February 4, 2018, at around 05:20, the Defendant assaulted the victim’s face by drinking, who was reported in the next place by the Defendant on the ground that he had interfered with the victim D (30 tax) (30) of the said singinging and drinking, as a matter of calculating the singing fee at C located in Seongbuk-gu, Seongbuk-gu, Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-gu, Seoul.

As a result, the Defendant inflicted injury on the victim, such as salt, tensions, etc. of the trokes that require treatment for about 14 days.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to D or E;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. On-site CCTV photographs;

1. Application of statutes on field photographs;

1. Relevant Article 257 of the Criminal Act and Article 257 of the Criminal Act (1) and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (the following favorable circumstances) include a large number of records of criminal records and family protection incidents against the defendant, and the fact that it is difficult to eliminate the risk of recidivism are disadvantageous.

However, in light of the fact that the defendant led to the confession of each of the crimes in this case, the degree of injury is not serious, the victim expressed his intention not to punish, the situation of Article 51 of the Criminal Act, and the scope of the recommended punishment in the sentencing guidelines, etc., the punishment shall be determined as per the order.

Rejection of Public Prosecution

1. On February 4, 2018, the Defendant: (a) the Defendant was reporting on the following facts of the facts charged: (b) a matter of calculating the singing fee in C located in Seongbuk-gu, Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-gu; (c) a matter of calculating the singing fee in C; and (d) the Defendant had been running in singing and singing.

D(30) On the ground of this interference, he assaulted the victim E (27 tax) who was a driver of D, who was sexually fluencing the face of D, and who was sexually flucated, the victim E (27 tax) of D, who was sexually flucated, assaulted the victim's face at the time of the victim's face.

2. Article 260 of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts charged for judgment: Article 260 of the Criminal Act.