logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.03.16 2015나66396
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. According to the purport of each of the statements and all of the arguments stated in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4 (including paper numbers), the defendant concluded a transport contract with the plaintiff around April 2014 and recognized the fact that the plaintiff transported the plaintiff's moving of the body around that time.

2. The plaintiff's assertion and judgment

A. In the course of transporting the Plaintiff’s assertion, the Defendant intentionally or by negligence lost goods of KRW 3830,000,000, 250,000,000,000 for video tefaf, which is owned by the Plaintiff, including KRW 560,00,00,000,000 for external efafabs, KRW 7,560,00 for external efabs, and KRW 5,000,00 for photo, etc., KRW 50,000,00 for books and several articles related to be

Therefore, the defendant is obligated to pay 3830,000 won and damages for delay to the plaintiff as damages.

B. The judgment of the court below is not sufficient to recognize the loss of the above goods asserted by the plaintiff by intention or negligence in the course of the transportation of this article, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

3. Thus, the plaintiff's claim of this case shall be dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow