beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment with prison labor for 6 years for each of the crimes of 1, 3, and 4 in its holding, and 6 months for each of the crimes of 2 in its holding.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
A on June 18, 2009, the Daegu District Court sentenced a suspended sentence of two years for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint injury) at the Daegu District Court on October 1009, and the judgment became final and conclusive on June 26, 2009.
1. Violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. by the Defendants (organization and activities of an organization) in violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. by the Defendants, among subparagraph 6 of the said 2016 Gohap and 29 Gohap 2016
A. A. An outline “Hmm” is an organization that is a criminal organization organized in Daegu area in 1973, in which part of the members of the Immm, who were a criminal organization in Daegu, withdraw from the organization, and newly forms a new officer after combining them. As seen below, the organization is a criminal organization with a leading system leading the organization or maintaining internal order, under the joint purpose that “an offense provided for in the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act is committed by multiple specific persons in view of its history, purpose, organization, fund, direction system, etc.”
B. At the time of the formation and composition of the Hmm, Defendant B joined the Im between the end of 1990 and the beginning of 2000, and accumulated the division as an apartment project implementation project with the three second spons, J, etc. However, at the time of around 2005, K, which became two spherically, was released from the Imm on the ground of drug medication. At around that time, Defendant A et al., et al., who was friendly in Im in the Im to the office located in Daegu L, led to Defendant A et al., who was frequently employed in the Imm to put spheric force.
On the other hand, while Defendant A joined the Imm between around 1985 and around 1990 and actively joined the Im from around 1990 and actively joined the organization, Defendant A was found to have without permission to replace the staff of the Imm after the Imm, and to re-enter into the Immm in the second floor restaurant at the time of the end of 2005 to February 2006.