1. The instant lawsuit shall be dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. 기초 사실 갑 제2호증의 1, 3, 4, 6의 기재에 변론 전체의 취지를 종합하면, 원고가 이 사건 토지에 관하여 이 법원 1985. 6. 28. 접수 제17860호로 소유권이전등기를 마친 사실, 피고가 1988. 8. 31. 이 사건 토지 지상에 건축된 이 사건 건물을 취득하여 현재까지 거주하여 오면서 사용ㆍ수익하고 있는 사실, 원고가 1988. 7. 27. 피고에게 이 사건 토지를 기간의 정함이 없이 임대료로 매년 백미 4말(斗)을 지급하는 조건으로 임대한 사실이 각 인정된다.

2. Determination on this safety defense

A. The Defendant’s assertion that the lawsuit of this case was unlawful, since it was not brought by a resolution of the clan general meeting held through legitimate procedures.

B. The plaintiff's legal nature 1) Matters concerning whether a clan or a similar clan organization has the capacity to be a party are matters to be examined ex officio by the court. Thus, if the party's legal assertion about the legal nature of an organization which is a party to a lawsuit or the basic identity of the facts alleged by the party is maintained in relation to its substance, it does not constitute a party's change. In such a case, the court may determine the party's ability according to its legal nature after determining whether the substance of the organization alleged by the party is a clan or a similar organization of a clan based on the facts examined ex officio (see Supreme Court Decision 2008Da45378, Oct. 9, 2008). In light of the following circumstances acknowledged by comprehensively taking into account the overall purport of arguments in the statement in subparagraphs 1 through 4 of the evidence No. 7, the plaintiff constitutes not only a unique meaning that naturally comes into existence by all descendants of the common ancestor, but also a similar organization corresponding to a clan which is composed of members of the clan, such as D's funds located in D E.