logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2014.10.08 2014고정1749
농수산물의원산지표시에관한법률위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who engages in drilling distribution and sales business under the trade name of “B.”

No person who produces, processes and ships agricultural products or processed agricultural products, or stores or displays them for the purpose of selling or selling shall place a false place of origin, or place a false label which may cause confusion with such products.

Nevertheless, from the end of October 201 to the end of November 2013, the Defendant purchased a large of KRW 51,713,00, which was produced by Cheongdo, such as the Cheongdo-gun, Cheongdo-gun, Cheongdo-gun, from the end of the end of the period of October 2011 to the end of the middle of the period of November 2013, and performed the product selection work, and then sold the 15k-g g c c c f c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c g c g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g m.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of D police statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on internal investigation (Attachment of photographs at a control site), photograph, internal investigation report (Attachment of current status to the Cheongdo Cheongdo Cheongdo Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do ), the current status of Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do , report on internal investigation (specific amount of estimated purchase purchased by A Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do ), the details of the agricultural

1. Articles 14 and 6 (1) 1 of the Act on Origin Labeling of Agricultural and Fishery Products concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act are as follows: (a) the confession and reflect of a crime by the defendant; (b) there is no punishment other than twice a fine; and (c) there is no same criminal record; and (d) the benefits acquired by the defendant from the crime of this case are relatively little; and (b) other various kinds of reasons indicated in the arguments of this case, including the defendant’s age, character and conduct, intelligence and environment, family relationship, motive, means and consequence of the crime; and (c) the circumstances after the crime

arrow