A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On June 14, 2018, around 21:08, the Defendant: (a) brought up a dangerous object, which is a dangerous object, by unilaterally speaking the Defendant’s complaint against his wife in front of the Seocheon-si, the residence of which was located; and (b) was demanded to set the knife from the police officer D, etc., who was the police officer of the 112 police box called the Defendant upon receipt of the 112 report.

The defendant does not comply with this, "I am kn't kn't kn't kn't kn't kn't.

“I am sound,” and the Defendant’s mother’s appearance in the process in which the Defendant’s father-child will knife the Defendant’s knife the knife, and the Defendant’s knife the Defendant’s knife.

It is intended to kill and throw away dogs.

"Alongly sound and the excess has been displayed to D."

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous articles and interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the protection of police officers' lives, bodies and property.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Each police statement made with respect to F, E, or D;

1. A protocol of seizure and a list of seizure;

1. Report on investigation (abstation accompanied by a patrol box) (abstation) and application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report an investigation (abstation of seized articles);

1. Relevant legal provisions of the Criminal Act, Articles 144(1) and 136(1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution. Article 62 (1) of the same Act on the grounds for sentencing as follows;

1. Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on the observation of protection;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 48(1)1 of the Confiscation Criminal Act (amended by Act No. 48(1) of the Confiscation Criminal Act / [the scope of recommendations] interference with the performance of official duties in the basic area (f.g., June 1 to June 1) (f., special mitigation (a.g., special mitigation)] (a decision of sentence] is against the Defendant’s mistake; the motive and circumstance leading up to the instant crime; the content and degree of the act interfering with the performance of official duties; the circumstances after the crime; and the previous records of the crime.