The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (one year of imprisonment, three years of suspended sentence, one year of probation, one year of community service order, 160 hours of confiscation, additional collection, 500,000 won) is too unreasonable.

2. The fact that the defendant shows an attitude against his mistake, and there is no criminal history exceeding the same criminal record and fine, etc. However, the crime of this case is an element of sentencing that can be considered for the defendant. The crime of this case is an act of arranging sexual traffic by employing the female female who does not have the status of sojourn or arranging sexual traffic. The crime of arranging sexual traffic is not so much of social harm, such as impairing the sound sexual culture and good morals by commercializing the female sex, and the number of employees and facilities employed by the defendant. In light of the number of employees and facilities of the business of this case, the size of the business of this case is considerably significant, and other factors such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, home environment, motive and circumstance of the crime, the means and consequence of the crime, etc., as shown in the argument of this case, and the application of the sentencing guidelines of the Sentencing Committee, it is not recognized that the punishment

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.