(영문) 서울행정법원 2019.05.02 2018구합71922

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울행정법원 2019.05.02 2018구합71922

재심판정취소 청구의 소

Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff, including the part resulting from the supplementary participation.

Reasons

1. Circumstances and details of the decision on reexamination;

A. The Plaintiff is a juristic person established on June 14, 1971 and engaged in the education business with educational facilities, such as C University and D Education Center (hereinafter “instant Education Center”) under its jurisdiction, including approximately 1,500 full-time workers.

The Intervenor joining the Defendant (hereinafter referred to as the “ Intervenor”) is a person who joined the Plaintiff on July 14, 2014 and served as the head of the school affairs team through the system management department.

B. On October 27, 2017, the Plaintiff was subject to disciplinary action against the Intervenor due to the grounds for disciplinary action as follows.

(2) On April 2017, 201, the Plaintiff was forced to submit a resignation report to a lower-ranking person, including the head of the team without legitimate procedures, on the grounds of occupational negligence, while serving as the head of the team. On the other hand, the Intervenor was forced a lower-ranking person, including the head of the team, to submit a resignation report on the grounds of occupational negligence. On the other hand, the Plaintiff failed to submit a resignation report to the lower-ranking person (hereinafter “Disciplinary Reason 2”), and the Plaintiff was forced to submit a resignation report to the lower-ranking person and to submit a verbal report. However, the Plaintiff did not immediately become aware of E’s retirement in the course of an interview with other employees after his retirement, and the Plaintiff did not interfere with the submission and approval of the resignation report by the head of the team and the head of the team, who was pointed out to the Governor, and did not immediately interfere with the official order of the lower-ranking person, and the Intervenor was forced to submit a resignation report by the head of the team and the head of the team, who was forced to withdraw his status.

유사 판례

-서울행정법원 2021.03.05 2020구합61768

-서울행정법원 2015.07.09 2015구합60129

-서울행정법원 2018.04.05 2017구합56605

-서울행정법원 2015.07.09 2013구합58450

-대전지방법원 2018.11.07 2018구합101580