The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. In light of the fact that misunderstanding of facts D around July 5, 2013, in dry field located in Daegu-gun E, the Defendant inflicted an injury on the Defendant’s chest, and the Defendant was under medical treatment by cutting down the bones, so the details of the complaint against D submitted by the Defendant are not false.

Nevertheless, the judgment of the court below which found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case is erroneous and adversely affected by the judgment.

B. The sentence imposed by the court below (two years of suspended sentence of imprisonment for eight months) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. The judgment of the court below that found the defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case is justified and the defendant's assertion is not reasonable, in full view of the following circumstances revealed by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court below and the court below's decision as to the assertion of mistake of facts.

D consistently states that, from an investigative agency to the court of the court below, the defendant did not assault the defendant as stated in the complaint, and that the defendant's body does not have dancing.

The Defendant asserts that there was F and G, who is an employee of the K Myeon Office in the field of assault that he was assaulted by D. At the time of the instant police investigation, F, at the time of the instant police investigation, stated that D, as at the time of the instant investigation, had escaped, had the Defendant flown away, had the Defendant flown away, or had not been pushed down (in the investigation record 37 pages), and stated that D had not satnddddd the Defendant’s body and had not satddd the Defendant’s body, and ③ G, at the court of the instant trial, stated that D had no physical contact between the Defendant and D at the time of the instant case, and that the Defendant had been set off with D, both F and G consistently made a statement consistent with D’s statement.

F and G are disadvantageous to the defendant.