1. On July 25, 2014, the real estate stated in the separate sheet between the defendant and the comprehensive construction company is concluded.

Facts of recognition

A. The Plaintiff’s claim 1) On December 14, 2012, the Plaintiff’s comprehensive construction (hereinafter “comprehensive construction”) is the Plaintiff’s comprehensive construction (hereinafter “comprehensive construction”).

(2) On June 24, 2013, the head of Dong-gu Busan Metropolitan Government and the head of Dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-Dong entered into a contract for construction work with the contract amount of KRW 610,000,00 and the construction period from December 17, 2012 to April 17, 2013. The Plaintiff entered into a contract for construction work with the comprehensive construction and the contract amount of KRW 632,00,000 on May 9, 2013 to extend the construction period to September 9, 2013.

3) However, the Plaintiff did not resume construction on the grounds of a subsequent civil petition in the vicinity. On October 11, 2013, the Plaintiff sent a document verifying that the said construction would cancel the said contract unless the construction is resumed by October 15, 2013. (4) On October 16, 2013, the Plaintiff filed a lawsuit claiming restitution of and damages from the rescission of the contract against the Gisung Comprehensive Construction. Busan High Court (2015Na328 (Main Claim), 2015Na3235 (Counterclaim)) decided that the said contract was lawfully rescinded from October 11, 2013 to October 25, 2015, from October 206 to 205, from October 2015 to June 31, 2015, from 2005 to June 25, 2016 to June 2015, 2015, respectively.