logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 원주지원 2013.04.02 2013고단63
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(위험운전치사상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a car in a SP area B.

1. On November 21, 2012, the Defendant driving the said vehicle at the section of approximately 1.2 km in front of the original city’s Gisung-dong’s Gisung-dong from the front of the original city’s Gisung-dong’s Gisung-dong’s Gidong under the influence of 0.121% of the blood alcohol content around 21:10 on November 12, 2012.

2. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Death or Injury caused by Dangerous Driving) was driven by the said vehicle under the influence of alcohol on the date and time set forth in the above Paragraph 1, and led the Defendant to stop one-lane of the three-lane distance from the south side of the Seoul Metropolitan City along the yellow Fluter in the direction of the original city.

At the same time, the victim C(n, 53 years old) was a three-lane road, and the victim C was carrying the victim E (e.g., the 51 years old) on the Done Star 6 Traz. Cargo, and was in the same direction as the signal stop prior to the signal stop, there was a duty of care to properly operate the brake while looking at the front.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and failed to properly operate the brake system under the influence of alcohol, and caused the front part of the vehicle in the foregoing stimul vehicle to shock the front part of the said stimul vehicle.

As a result, the Defendant driving a car in the above Spoty area where normal driving is difficult due to the influence of drinking, and suffered injury to the victim C and E, such as the salt of the wooden part which requires approximately two weeks medical treatment.

3. No motor vehicle which is not covered by mandatory insurance in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act shall be operated on a road;

Nevertheless, the Defendant operated the car at the time and place specified in Paragraph 1, which was not covered by mandatory insurance, as above.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1.C and E respective statements 1.

arrow