The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) of the lower court's punishment (one year and six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment defendant shows the attitude to recognize and reflect each of the crimes in this case.

The amount of profit actually acquired by the crime is not high.

In light of the fact that the defendant, not a conclusive intention, committed as if he were an employee of a financial institution to the victims, the number of crimes is several times, and remitted using another person's resident registration number, at least dolusent intention is recognized.

The degree of participation in the crime is relatively heavy.

It is the first crime.

However, the Bosing crime is a serious crime that is systematically planned against many unspecified persons and has a significant social harm that leads to the massing of many victims, and even a subordinate member who has participated in only part of the crime due to the nature that it is difficult to arrest the whole organization, it is necessary to severely punish the crime.

The defendant took part in the crime as a measure to collect singing while running as a bank staff, etc., and the role of the defendant is an essential role in the crime of singing.

Several victims and the amount of damage shall be 4,7760,000 won.

The damage was not recovered.

The judgment below

There is no change in circumstances that will be considered in sentencing thereafter.

In full view of other circumstances that are the conditions for sentencing as shown in records and pleadings, the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable.

Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.