logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 강릉지원 2018.09.13 2018고단528
도로교통법위반(사고후미조치)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant is a person engaging in driving service of a motor vehicle with B investment risk.

On June 5, 2018, the Defendant driven the said car while under the influence of alcohol at around 23:10, and moved the intersection of the three-way distance in front of C at the time of the East Sea to the implied middle school from the right edge.

At the same time, the roads that want to make a right-hand are night and are parked in a narrow and narrow road, so there are many vehicles, so the driver has a duty of care to safely make a right-hand and right-hand side and the right-hand side and the right-hand side of the vehicle that proceeds from the opposite side by accurately manipulating the steering direction and the steering gear, and to safely make a right-hand side.

Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant, while neglecting this, did not accurately handle Hands and by neglecting by bypassing it from the direction of the right-hand middle school to a certain apartment, destroyed the part behind the left-hand side of the victim E(56) driving of the f-hurged vehicle, which was parked, by taking the part behind the left-hand side of the Defendant’s vehicle and damaged the damaged party’s repair cost of 375,076 won, such as the replacement of the vehicle behind the vehicle by the victim.

Ultimately, the Defendant destroyed and damaged the car of the victimized person due to the above occupational negligence, and the victim immediately left his/her car and caused the Defendant to leave the car, but the Defendant did not take necessary measures and escaped without taking any necessary measures.

2. The Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (drinking) driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol 0.203% of alcohol concentration in the 1km section from the 1km to the 43rd-distance intersection in the same city, which occurred at the time of the same day of the same day as paragraph (1).

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. A survey report on actual conditions;

1. An accident scene photograph;

1. Reports on the detection of drivers at home and reports on the circumstances of drivers at home;

arrow