1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a maximum term of two years and by a short term of one year and six months;

2. A certificate (No. 1) and HUAWEI.

Punishment of the crime

In order to provide loans to many nominal holders of the passbooks, the telephone financial fraud assistance employee in the name-free statement made a proposal that the account needs to be used to secure a large amount of account, and the employee in other name-free services misleads a large number of unspecified victims to transfer money to the above large account that they should pay the existing loan in order to make a loan by misrepresenting a financial institution by telephone to an unspecified number of unspecified victims, and other employees conspired to block the crime of telephone financial fraud by withdrawing money by means of a cash card connected to the above large account.

1. On February 11, 2020, a telephone financial fraud assistance employee in the name of fraud made a false statement that “a loan may be made up to 60 million won.” After sending documents necessary for a loan by facsimile to the victim, he/she cannot receive a loan if he/she fails to repay the existing loan,” and then, he/she received KRW 50 million from the victim to the E-bank (F) account in the name of D on February 26, 2020, such as receiving KRW 5,000,000 from the victim at KRW 1 as shown in the attached crime list 1, such as receiving KRW 21 million from the victims.

On the other hand, on February 26, 2020, the Defendant collected one physical card connected to D’s bank account (F) from “H” located in Daejeon-dong, Daejeon-gu, Daejeon-gu, on or around February 19, 2020, and delivered three times from February 26, 2020 to February 27, 202, the Defendant sent one physical card, etc. under the name of another, as indicated in attached Table 1, to Non-Party 1, from February 26, 2020 to February 27, 2020.

Therefore, the defendant committed the crime of fraud by delivering the means of access connected to the hostile account to cash withdrawal books, etc. even though he/she knew that the 'tele financial fraud' belongs to the victim by deceiving the victim.