logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2013.12.27 2010가합117646
출입권 및 통행권 존재확인 등
Text

1. Of the plaintiffs' lawsuits against the defendants, the part of the plaintiffs' claim for confirmation of the existence of access and passage, and the defendant.

Reasons

1. Basic facts (1) On August 21, 2008, Dlim Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Slim”) concluded a contract with Nonparty A, a contracting officer representing the Army and Air Force Trade Agency (hereinafter “AFS”) (hereinafter “AFS”), which is a non-tax-invested institution of the U.S. military forces in the territory of the Republic of Korea, for three years from Oct. 2008 to Oct. 201, 2008, with the two-scam camp camyace case (Campceyy) and campp HHvey facilities (hereinafter “instant facilities”) and employees of the U.S. military unit and their family members within the U.S. military unit in the territory of the Republic of Korea (hereinafter “AFS”), including the following terms and conditions of the taxi service contract (hereinafter “instant service contract”).

[See]

C. A business license agreement; 17. A business license agreement between the holder of the goodwill and the employee of the holder of the goodwill (business license employee);

i. If the holder of the goodwill receives written notice from the contracting officer who is unable to, or could not, allow the work to be performed by a particular employee, the contract of this case, he must immediately discontinue the use of the employee in order to perform the contract of this case.

The goodwill holder shall not use the employee for the implementation of any contract entered into with AAFES without the prior written consent of the contracting officer in charge.

(2) The Plaintiffs were taxi drivers who entered into an employment contract with the dlim, and provided a taxi service while entering and passing through the instant facilities to the restricted taxi exclusively dedicated to usfk in accordance with the instant contract of dlim.

(3) Meanwhile, on August 28, 2010, the labor union members belonging to the Korea Transport Industry Trade Union, including the Plaintiffs, demand the refund of value-added tax, the improvement of the labor environment, the transparency of the operation structure, etc. of drones in line with the establishment of the instant facilities, and urge the conclusion of collective agreements.

arrow