Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On March 14, 2007, the Defendant was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment for fraud, etc. at the Seoul Southern District Court on July 9, 2007, and the execution of the sentence was terminated at the Seoul Southern District Court on September 30, 2009. On September 30, 2009, the Seoul Southern District Court sentenced eight months of imprisonment for fraud, which became final and conclusive on October 8, 2009.
Criminal facts
In March 2008, there are many people who want to receive construction orders from the victims L ( South and 47 years old) in the K office located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul, and the third floor, and from the victims L (V and 47 years old).
A false statement was made that the K Joint Representative M will pay KRW 0 million, and that it would be subject to the construction right of the golf course under construction in N in Yangyang-si, Namyang-si.
However, the defendant did not have worked as the director of the safe donation division, and even if he did not receive money from the damaged party due to lack of connection with construction, he did not have the intention or ability to receive the landscaping construction work.
Nevertheless, on April 22, 2008, the Defendant issued 10 million won to the account in the name of K Joint Representative M around April 22, 2008, from the victim who made such false statement to believe that it is true.
On May 23, 2008, the Defendant continued to provide meals to the victim at the front of Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government J on May 23, 2008.
In order to say to the persons related to military units, he/she made a false statement that he/she will grant the merchandise coupons 15 (1.5 million won per department store) to the persons related to military units so that he/she may carry out the construction work of 100,000 won per unit, so that he/she may do so.
However, the defendant did not have a person related to the military, and even if he received merchandise coupons from the victim, he did not have an intention or ability to give him the work of cutting trees.
Nevertheless, the defendant, as mentioned above, issued 100,00 won notes from the victim of tin, and issued 15 merchandise coupons to the department store.