1. The Defendant’s KRW 1,00,613,175 for the Plaintiff and 5% per annum from October 30, 2014 to August 16, 2018.

1. The following facts may be found either in dispute between the parties or in full view of each entry in Gap evidence 1, 3, and 6 (including paper numbers) and the entire purport of the pleadings:

B, around 14:50 on October 30, 2014, while under the influence of alcohol of 0.186% of the blood alcohol farming 0.186%, the Plaintiff’s driver’s vehicle with the center line in the front E-do located in the Chungcheongnam-gun budget-gun located in Chungcheongnam-nam budget-gun in the central line from the sukbrogate to the red erogate, and entered the same lane again, the lower part of the Plaintiff’s driver’s vehicle with the upper left side of the C-ray X-rayed vehicle with the upper right side of the C-ray. As a result, the said F-ray motor vehicle lost its center and it conflicts with the street trees beyond the opposite one.

In the event of the above traffic accident, the plaintiff suffered from injury such as chronic renal failure, neutism, neutical failure, leutical damage, leutical damage, and leutal damage due to leutical damage to light water.

(hereinafter referred to as the “instant accident”) B.

The defendant is an insurance company which has entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with C.

C. The plaintiff is a female of Girs.

2. According to the above fact of recognition of liability for damages, the accident of this case is an accident that caused the plaintiff's vehicle in the course of returning to the designated lane while driving a motor vehicle of this case under the influence of alcohol with the view of driving the motor vehicle of this case, in violation of the duty of care to safely drive the motor vehicle of this case on the designated lane, while driving the motor vehicle of this case, without properly examining the motor vehicle of this case, while driving the motor vehicle of this case in the front direction, and returning to the designated lane. Accordingly, as the plaintiff was injured, Article 3 (1) of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act, B is obliged to compensate the plaintiff for the

In addition, according to Article 10 (1) of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act, the plaintiff can claim a direct payment of insurance money against the defendant who is the insurance company of the automobile driven by B.

3...