A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On May 19, 2008, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of two million won for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) in the Goyang Branch of the Jung-gu District Court on May 19, 2008. On October 30, 2008, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for six months and two years of suspended execution.

On March 23, 2013, at around 20:10, the Defendant driven a B-pin car volume under the influence of alcohol content of approximately 0.063% from the 1km section of approximately 1km to the front road of 20:14 the same day from the roads near the Seoyang-gu Seoul Metropolitan City, Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, Seoul to the "Mayang-gu, Seoyang-gu, 11-3, Hanwon-dong, Seoul Metropolitan City.

After all, the Defendant, who violated the duty of prohibition on driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol not less than twice, was driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol again.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Report on the situation of running a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol;

1. Making a report on the control of drinking driving;

1. Previous records of judgment: Application of criminal records, inquiry reports, investigation reports (Attachment of judgment) and Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act (the point of drinking and the choice of imprisonment not less than three times);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (The following circumstances shall be considered in light of the reasons for sentencing);

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, Article 59 of the Probation Act, and Article 62-2 of the Act on the Order of Community Service and Order to Attend Education, and Article 59 of the Act on Probation, etc., even though the defendant was punished for a suspended sentence due to drinking driving, etc., he/she again repeats the same kind of punishment. However, recently, he/she does not have any special record of violation; recently, he/she does not have any special record of violation; recently, the fact of crime is the prevention of recurrence while recognizing the crime; the drinking measured values are relatively low and driving distance

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.