logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전고등법원 2019.08.29 2018누12280
손실보상금
Text

1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

3. The judgment of the court of first instance is ordered.

Reasons

1. The grounds for appeal by the plaintiffs citing the judgment of the court of first instance are not significantly different from the allegations in the court of first instance, and even if the evidence submitted in the court of first instance is examined together with the evidence submitted in this court, the fact-finding and judgment of the court of first instance are justified.

Therefore, the reasoning of the judgment of this court is that of the first instance court is dismissed in part of the reasoning of the judgment as set forth in the following Paragraph 2, and the attached Form of the first instance court is replaced by the attached Form of the judgment, and therefore, it is identical to the reasoning of the first instance court. Thus, it is accepted in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and

2. In the part of the judgment of the court of first instance, each of the “this Court”, “court appraisal”, “court appraiser”, and “court appraiser” in the part of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be respectively dismissed.

The term "Plaintiff M" in the last 3rd parallel shall be changed to "Plaintiff C, E, H, and I".

Nos. 5, 14, and 15 of the 5th page " it is reasonable to view the land of this case" has been written with "It is reasonable to regard the legitimate compensation for losses of the land of this case as the stated amount in the revised court appraisal column (B)" as shown in attached Table 4."

From the bottom of the 6th to the third place, the term “Ap. 7 and 8” shall be “Ap. 7, 8, 9, 15, 16”.

Part 8, Chapters 17 through 5 shall be changed to the following:

『 ㈏ 제1심 법원감정인의 감정결과와 제1심 법원감정인에 대한 사실조회 결과 및 변론 전체의 취지를 종합하면 아래의 사실이 인정된다. ① 제1심 법원감정인은 이 사건 토지와 가격형성요인이 동일 또는 유사한 아래의 토지를 비교표준지로 선정하였다. 공시기준일 : 2014. 1. 1. 기호 소재지 면적 (㎡) 지목 이용 상황 용도 지역 도로 교통 형상 지세 공시지가 (원/㎡) 비고 A 대전 서구 T 2,499 답 답기타 생산녹지 세로(불 세장형 평지 197,000 사업구역내 B 대전 서구 U 2,985 답...

arrow