Defendant

A Imprisonment for six months, Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of five million won, and Defendant D shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

Punishment of the crime

To the extent that there is no concern about actual disadvantage to the Defendants’ exercise of their respective defense rights, criminal facts are recognized by rhying the facts charged without modification of indictment.

Defendant A, B, and D were in office in the J market from July 1, 2006 to December 12, 201, and were authorized to direct and supervise personnel management, such as performance rating and personnel order, as the appointment authority and personnel management authority for public officials belonging to the J-si. Defendant B was authorized to comprehensively handle personnel management-related affairs by assisting the J market, who is the personnel management authority for public officials belonging to the J-si from November 10 to June 30, 209.

Defendant

D From March 1, 2010 to February 19, 2012, it was responsible for the performance evaluation in the general affairs and personnel management of the J's living support department.

According to the rules on the evaluation of local public officials, an appraiser (class V shall be the head of the Gu, class VI shall be the head of the Gu, class VI shall be the deputy head of the Gu, and class VI shall be the head of the Gu) and a confirmation person (class V shall be the head of the Gu) shall prepare and submit to the Work Performance Evaluation Committee a comprehensive list of the evaluation results of the public officials subject to the evaluation. The Work Performance Evaluation Committee requires the examination and determination of the priority and rating points of the public officials subject to the evaluation on the work Performance Evaluation Table based on the list of the evaluation units submitted as above, and the person who has the authority to appoint shall request the Work Performance Evaluation Committee to re-determination when it is deemed that the result of the determination

However, unlike the above provisions, the J-si shall prepare and submit to the General Affairs Department of the J-si and the Personnel Management Department of the J-si, and in the Personnel Management Department of the J-si, the list of the evaluation units submitted by each of the countries shall be taken, and it shall determine the order by all of the classes and series of classes of the J-si.