logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2017.06.29 2017고단1289
사기
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On May 16, 2017, the Defendant issued an order for alcohol and alcohol to F to his employees, who would normally pay the price in light of the victim D’s 'E main shop in light of light lighting around 01:30 on May 16, 2017.

However, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to pay the price even if he received an order of alcohol and safeness.

The defendant deceivings the victim as above and was provided with an amount equivalent to KRW 2,90,00,00 from the victim, including drinking and drinking.

"2017 Highest 1381" Defendant ma entering a H restaurant on May 16, 2017 at around 01:00 Ma

As a result of the settlement ability, I ordered the victim I to correct the cooling error.

However, there was no intention or ability to pay the price even if the defendant does cooling because he did not have any means of settlement during the period of time.

The defendant deceivings the victim as above, and was issued by the victim the air condition equivalent to KRW 11,00,000 at the market price.

Summary of Evidence

[2017 Highest 1289]

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written statement;

1. Receipts:

1. Investigation report (to hear statements by reference witnesses D) (2017 order 1381);

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written statement of I;

1. Application of an invoice statute;

1. Article 347(1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime and Article 347(1) of the choice of punishment for each of the crimes of this case, and the selection of fines for each of the crimes of this case (including not only the past record of punishment for the same kind of crime several times, but also the repeated crime due to the same crime, which was committed again without being aware of the fact that the defendant committed each of the crimes of this case, but also unfavorable circumstances, such as the fact that the defendant recognized his mistake and reflects it, the victims are not wanting to be punished for all of the crimes of this case,

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2)1 of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse.

arrow