logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2017.01.12 2016나2046947
손해배상(의)
Text

1. The plaintiff (appointed party)'s appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff (Appointed Party).

Reasons

1. The reasons why this court should explain are the same as the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance, except for dismissal or addition of the judgment of the plaintiff A’s assertion as follows, and thus, this is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Haon part 2, 2, 14, 15 - 15 - "Plaintiff B and C" - 11 - - 3 - 13 - 13 - the court of first instance - "the plaintiffs' claim on 2. - - 3 - - 14 - "the plaintiff's claim on 2. - "the plaintiff's claim on 3. - - - - 14 - due to the negligence of excessively towing the neys of the 3. 14 - due to the plaintiff's claim on 2. 3. - "the plaintiff's claim on 3. - - - 13 - "the plaintiff's claim on 4. - the last reduction of the 4. 15 - and under the 5th - the 5th - "the court" as "the plaintiff and the 8. - - - the plaintiff's plaintiff's plaintiff's - the plaintiff's plaintiff's claim on 5 - - - - - - the plaintiff".

B. In light of the same result of the Plaintiff’s reading check conducted on January 11, 2013 with the Plaintiff on May 27, 2013, and the result of the Plaintiff’s reading check conducted before and after the instant secondary surgery, Plaintiff A asserted that Plaintiff A suffered the instant disability since the Defendants did not perform necessary surgery, such as cutting off only the side signboards of the Plaintiff between Plaintiff Nos. 7 and chest No. 1, and removing the degree of pressure coming from water surface, and carried out the instant surgery on May 27, 2013, following the Defendants’ understanding that the Plaintiff’s climatic disease occurred at the time of the instant secondary surgery or the Plaintiff’s climatic was pressured for a long time. However, even though the Defendants knew that the Plaintiff’s climatic disease occurred at the time of the instant secondary surgery, the Plaintiff’s climatic surgery was conducted on May 1, 2012, and Nonparty No. 2, No. 1, No. 7 and No. 8-2, respectively.

arrow