1. The judgment of the first instance court, including the Plaintiff’s claim changed at the trial court, shall be modified as follows:

The defendant.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. (1) The Plaintiff is a management body comprised of all sectional owners pursuant to the Act on Ownership and Management of Condominium Buildings (hereinafter “Act on Ownership and Management of Condominium Buildings”) for the management and operation of the site and building of A department stores located in Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seoul (hereinafter “the instant condominium building”), and has managed the instant condominium building and imposed and collected management fees on the occupants.

(2) The Defendant is a co-owner who owns 214 and 215 of the instant aggregate building 4 stories (3.92 square meters of each exclusive ownership area, 3.796 square meters of a corridor, hereinafter the same shall apply).

B. (1) A, one of the sectional owners of the instant aggregate buildings, filed a lawsuit claiming return of unjust enrichment by asserting that the amount of management expenses imposed and collected pursuant to the Plaintiff’s management organization rules is not reasonable (the Incheon District Court Branch Branch Decision 2010Kadan39712) against the Plaintiff (the return of unjust enrichment by Incheon District Court Branch Decision 2010Na39712).

In the above case, in calculating the number of written resolution of sectional owners in accordance with the provision of Article 41 (1) of the Aggregate Buildings Act, in relation to the validity of the plaintiff's management body agreement, the court shall calculate the number of sectional owners in calculating the number of written resolution in the aggregate building, if one person owns several sections within the aggregate building, it shall be regarded as one sectional owners. The plaintiff's management body agreement did not meet the quorum due to the plaintiff's failure to obtain the consent or approval of more than 4/5 of the sectional owners of the aggregate building in this case

On January 21, 2015, the Plaintiff appealed (the Incheon District Court 2013Na6254) and filed an appeal (the return of unjust enrichment) (the return of unjust enrichment by 2014Da72197). However, both appeals and appeals were dismissed, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on January 21, 2015.

(2) The instant condominium does not have management regulations that are in force in the present.

C. The instant case.