The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The gist of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (three million won of a fine) is unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below, even though there was the record of punishment several times in violation of the Outdoor Advertisements, etc. Control Act, has committed a violation of the same type of outdoor advertisements, and the nature and circumstances of the crime are serious enough to induce employees to make a false confession in order to be exempted from the punishment. The punishment of the court below is a punishment imposed in consideration of the favorable circumstances such as the confession and reflect of the defendant. Other factors such as the motive and background of the crime of this case, the circumstances after the crime, the defendant's career, the environment, etc., are all considered, and it cannot be said that the sentence of the court below is unfair.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is without merit and it is so decided as per Disposition in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act.