1. The Defendant’s KRW 57,00,000 as well as 10% per annum from November 17, 201 to November 20, 2015 to the Plaintiff.

According to the purport of Gap evidence No. 1 and the whole pleadings, there is no dispute between the parties, or according to the purport of Gap evidence No. 1, the plaintiff lent KRW 7,000,000 to the defendant on May 1, 2006, ② KRW 13,000,000 on May 4, 2006, ③ KRW 25,000 on May 12, 2006, ④ KRW 50,000 on May 12, 2006, ⑤ KRW 20,000 on May 12, 2006, and KRW 20,000 on each interest rate, and KRW 10,00 on each of the above loans, and KRW 16,00 on each of the above loans, and KRW 3,00,000 on each of the above loans, and ⑤ the fact that the loans are repaid by the defendant on May 16, 2011.

According to the above facts, the Defendant is obligated to pay to the Plaintiff the amount of KRW 57,00,00 in total of the principal of each of the loans as stated, and the damages for delay calculated at the rate of 10% per annum under the agreed interest rate from November 17, 2011 to November 20, 2015, which is the day following the day when the Defendant repaid interest on each of the above loans to the Plaintiff, as sought by the Plaintiff, and the damages for delay calculated at the rate of 15% per annum under the Act on Special Cases concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings from the next day to the day of full payment.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim of this case is reasonable, and it is decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.