1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

(a) KRW 26,166,400 and interest rate of KRW 15% per annum from August 20, 2016 to the date of complete payment.

According to the Seoul Special Metropolitan City Yangju-gun, the Defendant’s telegraph, established a central road of 20 meters wide, which is a City/Do around 1968 without undergoing lawful compensation procedures under the Urban Planning Act or the Road Act, and incorporated each of the instant land into the road site, and divided it into asphalt Packaging on the roadway part among these lands, and cement block on the Indian part, and the first land listed on the separate sheet (hereinafter “the instant land 1”) and the second land listed on the separate sheet, the previous land category of which is the land category, and the fourth land listed on the separate sheet (hereinafter “the instant 2 land”) on January 11, 1969, and the fourth land listed on the separate sheet (hereinafter “the instant 4 land”), the land category of which is the previous land category, was 0.3, and the land category of which was 10,000 won on February 25, 197; the land category of which was 30,000 won on February 16, 198.

In calculating the rent for each of the lands of this case, the Defendant asserted that the appraisal report of this case is not acceptable as it is, without considering the fact that each of the lands of this case was used as a road at the time the Plaintiff acquired ownership. However, the appraisal report of this case is not acceptable as it is, based on each of the descriptions of the evidence Nos. 7 through 10 and 2.