1. The Defendant’s KRW 9,696,924 with respect to the Plaintiff and KRW 5% per annum from July 23, 2011 to September 22, 2015.

1. The Plaintiff, based on the premise, was on the back seat of the “K5” passenger car driven by B, and B, around 12:20 on July 23, 201, at the point of 172 km near the west Coast Highway, the Plaintiff was found to have started to reduce the speed of the taxi at the fixed speed, but he was able to see the back portion of the taxi, and the E- “e-car” car driven by D, which was driven by D, led to the said k5 passenger car.

Accordingly, there was an accident resulting in the injury of the Plaintiff, such as scarke, trauma-type, scarke, scarke, and scarke, scarke, and scarke, etc. (hereinafter “instant accident”).

On the other hand, the defendant is an insurer who has entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with respect to the above -car-car alliances.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, Eul evidence Nos. 2 and 3, Eul evidence Nos. 2 and 3, the result of the court's physical commission to the hospital in Chungcheongnam-nam, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the above recognition of the liability for damages, the above K5 car driver B and the above driver of the above Ka-Ka T-Ka T-Ka T-Tti driver caused the accident of this case due to negligence that caused the former driver's failure to perform his duty of care. Thus, the defendant is liable to compensate for the damages suffered by the plaintiff due to the accident of this case as the insurer of the above-Ka T-Ka T-Tti car.

3. Limitation on liability; and

A. The Defendant asserts that the Plaintiff should reduce the amount of damages in consideration of such circumstances, as the Plaintiff was accompanied by B’s vehicle, a joint tortfeasor, in order to play in the workplace and large bathing beach.

If the operator of a vehicle permits the boarding of the vehicle for the convenience and interest of the passengers without any consideration, and the passenger receives the provision for his/her own convenience and interest, in light of various circumstances, such as the purpose of operation, personal relations between the passenger and the operator, the background leading up to his/her being accompanied by the vehicle, and the purpose and active nature of the request for the boarding, etc., the perpetrator shall be general.