logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2017.07.06 2017고단700
업무방해
Text

Defendant

A and B Imprisonment for 10 months, and Defendant C shall be punished by a fine of 10,00,000 won.

Defendant

C The above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal record] Defendant B was sentenced to a suspended sentence of one year of imprisonment with labor for a crime of taking property in breach of trust at the Incheon District Court on September 8, 2016, and the above judgment was finalized on January 21, 2017.

[2] Defendant A, while working as the vice president in the labor and management sector of K Co., Ltd. from around June 2012 to March 2014, 2014, was in charge of various negotiations between labor and management, human resources for production workers, personnel management, and employees’ welfare; Defendant B, from around April 2014 to June 2016, was in charge of the same business as the vice president in the labor and management sector of the same company; Defendant C, who was in charge of the managing director in the labor and management sector of the same company from around January 2012 to around March 2014, was in charge of human resources and personnel management for production workers with the approval and approval of the vice president in the labor and management sector of the same company.

K is employing more than once a year of production workers (regular workers) through document screening, interview and physical examination only from among the workers who have worked for at least one year at the primary subcontractor. However, most workers who meet the career experience are applying for the recruitment of applicants, while K is taking the recruitment of applicants only among the applicants, and there is a strong competition among the applicants for employment in the course of regular recruitment.

On the other hand, in the labor and management sector which has overall control over the above recruitment, the company received the so-called "list of the recommended persons" from the side of the labor union's executive officer, and made them pass through the method of sexual manipulation, etc. when hiring the candidates. This was conducted by Defendant A, 2014, 2015, and 2016, under the direction of Defendant C's executive officer in charge of the labor and management sector, when hiring the vice president in 2012 and 2013, the general direction and approval of Defendant A, 2014, 2015, and 2016.

1. Defendant A and Defendant A.

arrow