1. The Defendant’s KRW 30,263,768 as well as the Plaintiff’s KRW 5% per annum from October 11, 2013 to December 18, 2015, and December 19, 2015.

1. Basic facts

A. The plaintiff is a special corporation established under the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act and entrusted with industrial accident compensation duties by the Minister of Employment and Labor, and is in the relationship between the insurer and the policyholder under the above Act.

B. The Defendant is an insurer that entered into a heavy equipment safety insurance contract with Nonparty C, the owner of BCH180-3 180 tons of a mid-term aircraft driven by Nonparty A (hereinafter “CCH180-3”).

C. At around 09:00 on September 26, 201, at the construction site of the E-project site located in Gyeongjin-gun, Gyeongjin-gun, which was performed by the non-party company, there was an accident in which the above A moved 40 tons of double block (TPPP) per unit into the instant e-mail to transfer to the instant e-mail, and the instant e-mail was destroyed by a double block while getting out of dredging to the concrete top on the surface of the speculation site, and then the e-mail was destroyed, which led to the destruction of double block, and the lower end of the left end of the construction site of the non-party F, a subcontractor of the non-party company, was the lower end of the construction site.

(hereinafter referred to as the "accident of this case")

D. According to the instant accident, the said F suffered injury “F” from the pressure strings on the left side, slopings on the left side, strings on the left side, strings on the left side, strings on the left side, strings on the left side, strings on the strings, and strings on the left side, and the Plaintiff paid 147,587,950 won, including medical care benefits 44,92,580 won, temporary disability compensation benefits 50,245,80 won, and disability lump sum 52,349,49,90 won.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute and the purport of Gap evidence 1 through 15 (if there are provisional numbers, including branch numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply) or photographs and the whole pleadings

2. Assertion and judgment on the assertion

A. The plaintiff and the defendant's argument that the above FF's occupational accident should be paid insurance benefits under the above Act, and the above F is entitled to subrogate the right to claim damages against the defendant under Article 87 of the above Act.